Virginia’s 2023 Law Simplifies Evidence Rules for Medical Records in Juvenile and Domestic Relations Cases

Posted by Wesley D. WornomMay 19, 20250 Comments

 
In Virginia's Juvenile and Domestic Relations (JDR) courts, the rules of evidence have long posed challenges for non-lawyers seeking justice. These rules, designed to ensure fairness by restricting what evidence can be presented, often frustrate those unfamiliar with legal processes. Among the most significant hurdles is the "Hearsay Rule," which frequently prevents out-of-court documents, such as medical records and bills, from being admitted as evidence unless someone, typically a professional, appears in court to authenticate them and answer questions. For many, the cost of securing such testimony is prohibitive, creating barriers to presenting critical evidence in cases involving child custody, domestic disputes, or juvenile matters. However, a new law, effective since 2023, is easing this burden by streamlining the process for admitting medical records and bills, offering relief to litigants navigating Virginia's JDR courts.
 
The Hearsay Rule, a cornerstone of evidence law, deems statements made outside the courtroom unreliable unless the person who made them can be cross-examined. In practice, this means medical records or bills—essential in cases involving injuries, mental health, or financial disputes—cannot simply be submitted as evidence. Instead, a doctor, nurse, or records custodian must testify to verify the documents' authenticity, a process that can cost hundreds or thousands of dollars in fees and travel expenses. For low-income families or self-represented litigants, who are common in JDR courts, this requirement often makes it impossible to present vital evidence, skewing case outcomes and undermining fairness.
 
Recognizing this issue, Virginia lawmakers introduced Section 16.1-345.2, which passed and was added to the Code of Virginia in 2023. This new statute allows medical records and bills to be admitted as evidence in JDR cases without the need for in-person authentication, provided certain conditions are met. Specifically, a party must provide the records and a written notice to the opposing party at least 30 days before the hearing. This notice gives the other side an opportunity to review the documents and raise objections if necessary, preserving fairness while eliminating the costly requirement of live testimony.
 
The impact of Section 16.1-345.2 is significant. For example, in a custody dispute where a parent's mental health is at issue, medical records documenting treatment can now be submitted directly, provided the 30-day notice is given. Similarly, in cases involving domestic violence, victims can more easily present medical bills or records to substantiate claims of injury. This change levels the playing field, particularly for those who cannot afford legal representation or expert witnesses, by reducing financial and logistical barriers to presenting evidence.
The law also aligns with broader efforts to make Virginia's courts more accessible. JDR courts handle a high volume of cases, many involving self-represented litigants who struggle to navigate complex legal rules. By simplifying the process for admitting medical records, Section 16.1-345.2 reduces the procedural burden on these individuals, allowing judges to focus on the merits of the case rather than technicalities. Data from Virginia's court system is not yet widely available to quantify the law's impact, but anecdotal reports from legal aid organizations suggest it has already helped numerous litigants present evidence that might otherwise have been excluded.
 
However, the law is not without limitations. The 30-day notice requirement demands advance planning, which may challenge those unfamiliar with court procedures. Additionally, the opposing party can still object to the records' admissibility on other grounds, such as relevance or completeness, meaning disputes over evidence may persist. Legal advocates emphasize the importance of educating the public about the new rule to maximize its benefits.
 
Section 16.1-345.2 represents a meaningful step toward a more equitable JDR court system. By addressing the practical challenges posed by the Hearsay Rule, Virginia is ensuring that medical records and bills—often critical to case outcomes—can be presented without undue financial strain. As awareness of the law grows, it promises to empower more Virginians to seek justice in juvenile and domestic relations cases.
Word count: 600